i caught superman returns this weekend on television. i'm not much for super hero movies but for some reason, i watched it. while watching the movie, i came to the conclusion that superman/clark kent is creepy.
superman does a number of creepy things. the first being, he floats outside her window using his super hearing and x-ray vision to spy on her. if you take away the super powers and substitute guy across the street, this is very stalkerish. later in the movie, superman, as clark kent, watches lois lane walk to an elevator and uses his x-ray vision to watch her in the elevator go to the roof. Again, if you take away the super powers, following someone around is a stalker activity.
you say, "miss wolfe, you are only mentioning one movie."
true, but if you go back to the 1978 superman movie, lois lane dies. superman can't take this so he flies around the world backwards to reverse history. he doesn't do this to save a group of people, he does this to save one person. surely, he does this because of love. right. in superman 3, he moves on to lana lang. he has this same attachment in the smallville series on tv to lana lang.
superman is for truth, justice and the american way. he is a super hero. bullshit. his only goal is to track down the woman he "loves". there should be an investigation into his real motives.
- miss wolfe
4 comments:
IIRC, the real (i.e. comic book) Superman wasn't like that. I think they decided to play up the romance angle for the movies.
http://www.superdickery.com/
because I think you would find this greatly amusing....
Did you ever think about what it would be like to have Superman as your lover? The cum would have incredible force, the thrusts would be fast and furious (though probably without the usual hitting of bone), and the passioned grip would be deadly (or close thereto). Give him a blow job would be an interesting adventure, for sure, esp. if he never cued one of the impending release. Funny, no one ever thinks of that dimension.
Post a Comment